<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="1139" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="http://repositorio.febab.org.br/items/show/1139?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-05-21T16:01:31-07:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="600">
      <src>http://repositorio.febab.org.br/files/original/18/1139/cbbd1977_doc75.pdf</src>
      <authentication>dce173556be2b559a204b22e7f28697e</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="92">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="14952">
                  <text>DEVELOPMENTS IN INDEXING
DEVELOPMENTSININDEXING

K.G.B. BAKEWELL, MA, FLA, AMBIM
Sênior Lecturer, Department of Library and
Senior
Information Studies, Liverpool Polytechnic, England

INTRODUCTION
I should like to deal with developments in indexing very briefly under five broad
headings:
author-title approach.
1. The author-titie
2. General classification schemes.
3. Special classification schemes.
4. The alphabetical subject approach.
5. Combinations of 3 and 4.

THE AUTHOR-TITLE APPROACH
author-title approach has been revolutionised since the Paris Conference of
The author-titie
1961. We now have (almost) international agreement on the description of documents
(with the International Standard Bibliographic Oescriptions
Descriptions or ISBDs) and on choice and
form of headings (with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules
Ruies of 1967 (AACR) and
other national codes based on AACR). There are; as I1 see it, two major failures in author/
title cataloguing: one is the fact that I had to use the plural form for ISBDs
titie
ISBOs — why
cannot we have one description for all kinds of materials,
materiais, whether books, periodicals or
audio-visual materiais?
materials? The second is our failure to drop the main entry principle,
principie, which
surely has no meaning in these days of MARC and other computer
Computer systems. But the new
edition of AACR wili
will move the section on choice qf main entry from Part 1 to Part 2,
after description.
252

Digitalizado
gentilmente por:
gentiimente

�GENERAL CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES
In the field of general classification, Dewey remains preeminent in spite of
movements to Library of Congress in many libraries in the United States. The 19th
edition wili
will shortiy
shortly be upon us and this wili
will doubtiess
doubtless show more trends towards modern
faceted structure, including a new schedule for music based on the faceted classification
classification'
devised by Coates for the British
Brítish Catalogue of Music. The Universal Decimal Classification
appears to be losing ground, while the Library of Congress Classification is widely
adopted in the United States. An interesting development in Britain is the revised edition
of Bliss's BibUographic
Bibliographic Classification prepared by Jack Mills, the first three volumes of
which were published by Butterworths at the beginning of this year. I fear that, like the'
the
first edition, it may have come too late, though I know of two British libraries (the
Tavistock Institute in London and Bishop Grosseteste College in Lincoln) which have
aiready
already started to reclassify by this scheme and one large government library (the
Department of Health and Social Security) which plans to use it from 1978. In spite of
my high regard for Dr. Ranganathan and Professor Neelameghan, I have no great hopes
for the future of the Colon Classification outside India — though it is used in two quite
differente British libraries (Christ's College, Cambridge and Metal Box Ltd.).

SPECIAL CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES
There is a mixed reaction to special classification schemes. On the one hand, for
example, the Harvard Classification of Business Literature^ appears to be failing
falling out of
use, even the Harvard Business School (the library for which it was designed) having
changed to Library of Congress. On the other hand the National Library of Medicine
Classification^, a special scheme based on the traditional enumerative principles
principies of
Library of Congress, is gaining ground due partly
partiy to the centralized cataloguing services
Services
provided by the National Library of Medicine. Is was found in 1976 that 59 British
libraries were using this classification^, compared with only 11 according to a survey in
1974'*. The 1974 survey indicated that 404 libraries in the United States and Canada
were using the classification.
Several specialised classification schemes have been developed in Britain based on
the faceted principies
principles of Ranganathan. One of the earliest was the British Catalogue of
Music Classification^ which, although devised specifically for a bibliography, is also
aiso used
in libraries for shelf arrangement and/or a classified catalogue. The Classification Research
Group's Classification of Library and Information Science^ has been less successfui
successful in
libraries, having been rejected by both the British Library (Library Association) and the
College of Librarianship Wales. The London Classification of Business Studies^ is known
to be used in 40 British libraries and 22 libraries outside Britain.® It is being revised at
Liverpool Polytechnic's Department of Library and Information Studies with financial
support from the Social Science Research Council.
253

cm

Digitalizado
gentilmente por:
gentílmente

12

13

14

�THE ALPHABETICAL SUBJECT APPROACH
There is still
stili considerable use of the Library of Congress Subject Headings
(especially in the United States) and chain indexing (especially in Britain). A specialized
list which is used widely both in pre-co-ordinate mode and (especially linked with
MEDLARS and MED
MEDLINE)
LI NE) in post-co-ordinate mode is the National Library of
Medicine's Medical
Medica! Subject Headings (MeSH).^ KWOC (Keyword out of Context)
indexes, based mainly on natural language but sometimes with terms added by the
indexer, are now used in general libraries as well as the specialist libraries which first made
heavw used of them Liverpool Polytechnic Library, for example, includes keywords form
heaw
titles in its alphabetical catalogue and experiments at Bath University Library have
tities
indicated that students prefer using the KWOC index to the more traditional classified
catalogue and chain index.*
index.' °" Glasgow University Library has recentiy
recently produced a revised
edition of its list of general reference works in KWOC index form.
But perhaps the most interesting development in the field of pre-co-ordinate
alphabetical indexing is PRECIS {PREserved
(PREser^eá Context /ndex System), introduced by the
British Nationai
National Bibiiography
Bibliography in 1971 and now used in a number of other bibliographies
and catalogues including Australian
Austraiian National
Nationai Bibliography
Bibiiography and British Education index.
system''‘ and time does not permit a detailed
There are several accounts of this system’
explanation of it here. I should, however, like to give two examples to illustrate its use in
the British National
Nationai Bibliography
Bibiiography and the library of the Inner London Education
Authority's Centre for Learning Resources:

Exampie
Example 1: (The British National Bibliography)
Bibiiography)
A book on the sociological perspectives of bilingualism in Canada receives the
following subject index entries:
CANADA
Biblingualism. Sociological perspectives

301.21

BILINGUALISM. Canada
Sociological perspectives

301.21

SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES. Bilingualism. Canada

301.21

254

Digitalizado
gentilmente por:

Ll

12

13

14

�Example 2: (Inner London Education Authority's Centre for Learning Resources)
entitled "Skeleton and muscle" receives the following
A filmstrip and pamphlet entitied
subject index entries;
ANIMALS
Movement. Role of musculoskeletal system
System

591.1852

MOVEMENT. Animais
Animals
Role of musculoskeletal System
system

591.1852

MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM. Role in movement. Animais
Animals

591.1852

It wili
will be seen from the above examples that user is given a full subject statement
undei whatever term he chooses to enter the index.
At present we are conducting a survey at Liverpool Polytechnic of reactions of
indexers to the PRECIS system, with financial support from the British Library. There
have been a number of experiments to assess the suitability of the system for languages
other than English.
Many libraries use the post-co-ordinate approach to alphabetical indexing, the terms
representing a compound subject being combined by the searcher instead of the indexer.
For example, the British National Bibliography entry above would be indexed on three
feature cards under CANADA, BILINGUALISM and SOCIOLOGY and the cards would
be matched when a document was sought on the sociology of bilingualism in Canada. In
Britain such Systems
systems are very popular in two quite different kinds of library — special
(particularly industrial) libraries and school libraries. In the former — and indeed in all
—They have the great advantage that they form the basis of on-line
research librearies —"they
retrieve! Systems
systems like MEDLINE and ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center).
retrievel
Many thesauri have been developed for use in post-co-ordinate Systems
systems like the ERIC
Thesaurus,^ ^ the MeSH List‘d
Thesaurus,^^
List^ (used also
aiso in pre-co-ordinate systems)
Systems) and the Thesaurus of
Engineering and Scientific Terms (TEST).*^

COMBINATIONS OF CLASSIFICATION AND THE ALPHABETICAL SUJBECT
Finally, a trend which began eight years ago and which I am sure wilI
will develop — the
production of classification
classificationschemes-cum-thesauri
schemes-cum-thesauri which can be used — and are being used
— for shelf arrangement and for alphabetical indexing in pre-co-ordinate or
post-co-ordinate mode. The pioneer was Jean Aitchison's Thesaurofacet,^
Thesaurofacet,^^^ developed
from the English Electric Company's Faceted Classification for Engineering and published
in 1969. This was followed in 1974 by the second edition of London Education
Classification: a thesaurus/classification of British educational terms by Douglas and Joy
Foskett,*^ now used for shelf arrangement (for example in the University of London
255

cm

Digitalizado
gentilmente por:

12

13

14

�Institute of Education Library), for classified catalogues, and for alphabetical subject
headings in computer-produced indexes and bibliographies (for example Register of
Educational Research in the United Kingdom 1973-1976^
Educationa!
1973-1976^^).
^). It is our intention that the
revision of the London Classification of Business Studies wili
revísion
will follow this trend.

REFERENCES
1. Baker Library, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. A
classification of business literature.
literatura. 2nd ed. Hamden (Connecticut): Shoe String
Press, 1960.
2. National Library of Medicine. National Library of Medicine classification: a scheme
for the arrangement ofbooks
of books in the field of medicine and its related sciences.
Sciences. 3rd
ed. Bethesda (Maryland), 1969.
3. Jenkins, S.R. British medical
medicai libraries today. Library Association Medical
Medica! Section
Bulletin, (107), 1976, 5-6.
BuUetin,
4. Sheerer, George and Hines, Lois E. Classification systems
Systems used in medical
medicai libraries.
Bulletin of the Medica!
BuUetin
Medical Library Association, 62(3) July 1974, 273-280.
5. Coates, E.J. The British Catalogue of Music classification. London;
London: Council of the
British National Bibliography, 1960.
6. Classification Research Group. A classification of library and information
Information science, by
Ruth Daniel and J. Mills with the assistence of R. Selwood and Pirkka Ellíott.
Elliott.
London: Library Association, 1975.
7. Vernon, K.D.C. and Lang, Valerie. The London classification of business studies.
London: London Graduate School of Business Studies, 1969.
8. Bakewell, K.G.B. and Cotton, D.A., comps. The London classification of business
studies: an introduction and directory of users. 2nd ed. Liverpool: Liverpool
Polytechnic, Departament of Library and Information Studies, 1977. (Occasional
paper 7, revised).
9. Medical
Medica! subject headings. Bethesda (Maryland): National Library of Medicine, annual.
2 vols.
10. Needham, Angela. Performance of four orders of catalogue: user times and success
rates for name, title,
titie, KWOC and classified catalogues and Classified or KWOC
indicative comparison of the success and usability of a KWOC
catalogues: an indicativa
catalogue with UDC catalogues at four university libraries. Bath: Bath University
Library, 1975. (Bath University comparative catalogue study: final report, paper
n.°* 5 and 6, bound together).

256

Digitalizado
gentilmente por:

4?^
LI

12

13

14

�11. Notably PfíECIS:
PRECIS: a manual of concept analysis and subject indexings, by Derek
Austin, London:
London; Councíl
Council of the British National Bibliography, 1974. Other
contributions include Austin, Derek. The development of PRECIS: a theoretical
and technical history. Journal of Documentation, 30(1) March 1974, 47-102;
Bakewell, K.G.B. The PRECIS indexing System.
system. The Indexer, 9(4) October 1975,
160-166.
12. Educational Resources Information Center. Thesaurus of ERIC descriptors. 6th ed.
New York: Macmillan Information, 1975.
13. Thesaurus of engineering and scientific terms. New York: Engineers' Joint Council,
1967.
14. Aitchison, Jean and associates. Thesaurofacet: a thesaurus and faceted dassification
classification
for engineering and related topics. Whetstone (Leicestershire, England): English
Electric Company, 1969.
15. Foskett, D.J. and Foskett, Joy. The London education dassification:
classification: a
thesaurus/classification of British educational terms.
thesaurus/dassification
terms 2nd ed. London;
London: University
of London Institute of Education Library, 1974. (Education Librarias
Libraries Bulletin,
supplement 6).
suppiement
16. Registar
Register of educational research in the United Kingdom, 1973-1976. Windsor
(Berkshire, England);
England): National Foundation for Educational Research in England
and Wales, 1976.

257

cm

Digitalizado
gentilmente por:

11

12

13

14

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="18">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13762">
                <text>CBBD - Edição: 09 - Ano: 1977 (Porto Alegre/RS)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13763">
                <text>Biblioteconomia&#13;
Documentação&#13;
Ciência da Informação</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13764">
                <text>Inclui também os anais da V Jornada Sul-Rio-Grandense de&#13;
Biblioteconomia e Documentação</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13765">
                <text>FEBAB</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13766">
                <text>1977</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13767">
                <text>Português</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13768">
                <text>Evento</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="13769">
                <text>Porto Alegre/RS</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="8">
    <name>Event</name>
    <description>A non-persistent, time-based occurrence. Metadata for an event provides descriptive information that is the basis for discovery of the purpose, location, duration, and responsible agents associated with an event. Examples include an exhibition, webcast, conference, workshop, open day, performance, battle, trial, wedding, tea party, conflagration.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14943">
              <text>Developments in indexing</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14944">
              <text>Bakewell, K. G. B.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="38">
          <name>Coverage</name>
          <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14945">
              <text>Porto Alegre (Rio Grande do Sul)</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14946">
              <text>FEBAB</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14947">
              <text>1977</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14949">
              <text>Evento</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14950">
              <text>Indexação (biblioteconomia)</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="14951">
              <text>The author-title approach has been revolutionised since the Paris Conference of 1961. We now have (almost) international agreement on the description of documents (with the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions or ISBDs) and on choice and form of headings (with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules of 1967 (AACR) and other national codes based on AACR). There are; as 1 see it, two major failures in author/title cataloguing: one is the fact that I had to use the plural form for ISBDs — why cannot we have one description for all kinds of materials, whether books, periodicals or audio-visual materials? The second is our failure to drop the main entry principle, which surely has no meaning in these days of MARC and other computer systems. But the new edition of AACR will move the section on choice qf main entry from Part 1 to Part 2, after description.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="65507">
              <text>pt</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
